In our study, published in Nature Human Behaviour, human volunteers were presented with multiple visual objects that they were required to keep in memory. After a brief memory period (in the order of seconds), participants received a cue to select the memorised visual object that was to be reported subsequently. Our data reveal that such internal focusing (putting the ‘spotlight’ on a representation in the mind;) does not stay undetected in peripheral measurements of gaze. Instead, internal focusing is paired with an increase in tiny eye movements (called micro-saccades; ) in the direction of the memorised location of the focused memory representation (though there was nothing to look at on the screen). In other words, what gets focused in the mind’s eye can be ‘read-out’ from the actual eye. Importantly, because the neural architecture that supports such eye movements is well characterised ( ), this also informs on the neural substrates that are engaged when we focus our mind’s eye.
The identification of this remarkable phenomenon was not planned, but serendipitous. As if often the case in laboratory experiments of mental states, eye-tracking was initially included solely for control purposes. Having stumbled across this phenomenon, however, we soon came to realise the exciting nature of it, and embarked on a series of targeted experiments specifically aimed at demonstrating and understanding the nature of this phenomenon. These are the experiments that we report on in our manuscript.
Though our discovery was neither planned nor anticipated, it builds on a long line of research that had already linked the brain’s oculomotor system (that governs where we look) to the allocation of covert attention in the context of perception (
Looking ahead, our study promotes the utility of carefully measuring peripheral responses to capture ‘fingerprints’ of mental processes that need not be confined to the inner space between our ears (see e.g.